Untitled Document
Untitled Document

DC appellate court rules that FERC lacks authority to regulate natural gas futures contracts

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided March 15 that the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has exclusive jurisdiction over all transactions involving commodity futures contracts and that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may not regulate such contracts, even when they pertain to natural gas. This decision marks at least the third time an appellate court has struck down FERC’s expansive interpretation of the authority it was granted in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

The Energy and Project Finance Group at Ballard Spahr LLP in Washington DC offered this explanation and timeline for the events leading up to the March 15 ruling:

FERC initially fined Brian Hunter $30 million for manipulating natural gas futures contracts. Hunter, an employee of the hedge fund Amaranth, traded natural gas futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange, a CFTC-regulated exchange.

Commodities futures contracts are executory contracts for the sale of a commodity executed at a specific point in time with delivery of the commodity postponed to a future date. The parties to such contracts often use them for speculation on the commodity’s future price and rarely settle their obligations by actual delivery.

According to FERC, Hunter was guilty of “banging the close,” or selling a significant number of natural gas futures contracts during the February-April 2006 settlement periods with the intent of lowering the settlement price for natural gas. Hunter’s portfolio benefited from these sales because he had positioned his assets in the natural gas market to capitalize on a price decrease.

On July 25, 2007, the CFTC filed a civil enforcement action against Hunter under the Commodity Exchange Act for manipulating the price of natural gas futures contracts. On the next day, FERC filed an administrative enforcement action against him also alleging market manipulation under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). In bringing this action, FERC relied in part on its expanded NGA authority to regulate manipulation in the energy markets, as enacted by Congress in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

FERC claimed that Hunter’s manipulation of the settlement price affected the price of natural gas in FERC-regulated markets. Following an administrative process, FERC ruled against Hunter and fined him $30 million.

Hunter appealed to the DC Circuit, arguing that FERC lacks jurisdiction to pursue its enforcement action, and the CFTC intervened in support of Hunter on this issue. The DC Circuit agreed that the CFTC’s jurisdiction over commodity futures transactions is exclusive. As a result, FERC may not intrude on CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction by prohibiting manipulation in futures markets, even where the manipulation is “in connection with” FERC-jurisdictional natural gas transactions.

The court decision also brings into question the wisdom of FERC’s settlement of a 2009 enforcement action with Amaranth concerning similar alleged price manipulation. Amaranth agreed to pay $7.5 million and conceded FERC’s jurisdiction in this matter.

Related Articles

Parsley Energy joins Russell indexes

07/01/2014 Parsley Energy Inc. has been added to the broad market Russell 3000, small-cap Russell 2000, and Russell Global indexes, along with appropriate style, sector, and country indexes, effective after t...

Chesapeake completes spin-off of oilfield services business

07/01/2014 Chesapeake Energy Corp. has completed the spin-off of its oilfield services business, previously conducted through Chesapeake Oilfield Operating LLC, into a stand-alone, publicly traded company cal...

CorEnergy set to join Russell indexes

06/30/2014 CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust Inc. is expected to join the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, the broad-market Russell 3000 Index, the Russell Microcap Index, and the Russell Global Index as part of Ru...

IHS: Escalating costs driving diminishing returns for oil and gas companies despite stronger oil prices

06/27/2014 Despite stronger oil prices, corporate returns on average capital employed (ROACE) are lower than in 2001, when oil prices were less than $30 per barrel, according to research from information and ...

Lilis Energy regains NASDAQ compliance

06/20/2014 Lilis Energy Inc. has been informed by the NASDAQ Stock Market that, based on the June 11 and 17 filings of the company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and Form 10-Q for th...

More Oil & Gas Financial Articles

Parsley Energy joins Russell indexes

Tue, Jul 1, 2014

Parsley Energy Inc. has been added to the broad market Russell 3000, small-cap Russell 2000, and Russell Global indexes, along with appropriate style, sector, and country indexes, effective after the market close on June 27, in association with Russell Investments’ annual reconstitution of its comprehensive set of US and global equity indexes.

Chesapeake completes spin-off of oilfield services business

Tue, Jul 1, 2014

Chesapeake Energy Corp. has completed the spin-off of its oilfield services business, previously conducted through Chesapeake Oilfield Operating LLC, into a stand-alone, publicly traded company called Seventy Seven Energy Inc.

CorEnergy set to join Russell indexes

Mon, Jun 30, 2014

CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust Inc. is expected to join the small-cap Russell 2000 Index, the broad-market Russell 3000 Index, the Russell Microcap Index, and the Russell Global Index as part of Russell Investments' annual reconstitution of its US and global equity indexes.

IHS: Escalating costs driving diminishing returns for oil and gas companies despite stronger oil prices

Fri, Jun 27, 2014

Despite stronger oil prices, corporate returns on average capital employed (ROACE) are lower than in 2001, when oil prices were less than $30 per barrel, according to research from information and insight provider IHS (NYSE: IHS).

Lilis Energy regains NASDAQ compliance

Fri, Jun 20, 2014

Lilis Energy Inc. has been informed by the NASDAQ Stock Market that, based on the June 11 and 17 filings of the company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, and Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014, respectively, that the company complies with the periodic filing requirement of Rule 5250(c)(1).


Most Popular

Oil & Gas Jobs

Search More Job Listings >>
Subscribe to OGFJ