•  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Untitled Document
    Untitled Document

    DC appellate court rules that FERC lacks authority to regulate natural gas futures contracts

    The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia decided March 15 that the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has exclusive jurisdiction over all transactions involving commodity futures contracts and that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) may not regulate such contracts, even when they pertain to natural gas. This decision marks at least the third time an appellate court has struck down FERC’s expansive interpretation of the authority it was granted in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

    The Energy and Project Finance Group at Ballard Spahr LLP in Washington DC offered this explanation and timeline for the events leading up to the March 15 ruling:

    FERC initially fined Brian Hunter $30 million for manipulating natural gas futures contracts. Hunter, an employee of the hedge fund Amaranth, traded natural gas futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange, a CFTC-regulated exchange.

    Commodities futures contracts are executory contracts for the sale of a commodity executed at a specific point in time with delivery of the commodity postponed to a future date. The parties to such contracts often use them for speculation on the commodity’s future price and rarely settle their obligations by actual delivery.

    According to FERC, Hunter was guilty of “banging the close,” or selling a significant number of natural gas futures contracts during the February-April 2006 settlement periods with the intent of lowering the settlement price for natural gas. Hunter’s portfolio benefited from these sales because he had positioned his assets in the natural gas market to capitalize on a price decrease.

    On July 25, 2007, the CFTC filed a civil enforcement action against Hunter under the Commodity Exchange Act for manipulating the price of natural gas futures contracts. On the next day, FERC filed an administrative enforcement action against him also alleging market manipulation under the Natural Gas Act (NGA). In bringing this action, FERC relied in part on its expanded NGA authority to regulate manipulation in the energy markets, as enacted by Congress in the Energy Policy Act of 2005.

    FERC claimed that Hunter’s manipulation of the settlement price affected the price of natural gas in FERC-regulated markets. Following an administrative process, FERC ruled against Hunter and fined him $30 million.

    Hunter appealed to the DC Circuit, arguing that FERC lacks jurisdiction to pursue its enforcement action, and the CFTC intervened in support of Hunter on this issue. The DC Circuit agreed that the CFTC’s jurisdiction over commodity futures transactions is exclusive. As a result, FERC may not intrude on CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction by prohibiting manipulation in futures markets, even where the manipulation is “in connection with” FERC-jurisdictional natural gas transactions.

    The court decision also brings into question the wisdom of FERC’s settlement of a 2009 enforcement action with Amaranth concerning similar alleged price manipulation. Amaranth agreed to pay $7.5 million and conceded FERC’s jurisdiction in this matter.

    Related Articles

    Probabilistic portfolio analysis

    08/11/2014 Risk and uncertainty are rarely evaluated as an integral part of the planning process. An array of risks-from hydrocarbon potential and operating characteristics, to political or market factors-can...

    Paragon Offshore completes spin-off from Noble

    08/05/2014

    Paragon Offshore plc has completed its spin-off from Noble Corp. plc into a separate, publicly traded company that owns and operates standard specification offshore drilling rigs.

    Aker Solutions updates on proposed demerger

    07/11/2014 The board of directors of Aker Solutions ASA has, in accordance with the strategy disclosed April 30, resolved to propose to the company's shareholders that Aker Solutions be split into two compani...

    Parsley Energy joins Russell indexes

    07/01/2014 Parsley Energy Inc. has been added to the broad market Russell 3000, small-cap Russell 2000, and Russell Global indexes, along with appropriate style, sector, and country indexes, effective after t...

    More Oil & Gas Financial Articles

    Probabilistic portfolio analysis

    Mon, Aug 11, 2014

    Risk and uncertainty are rarely evaluated as an integral part of the planning process. An array of risks-from hydrocarbon potential and operating characteristics, to political or market factors-can have a significant impact on business performance.

    Paragon Offshore completes spin-off from Noble

    Tue, Aug 5, 2014

    Paragon Offshore plc has completed its spin-off from Noble Corp. plc into a separate, publicly traded company that owns and operates standard specification offshore drilling rigs.

    Chesapeake, RKI swap Powder River Basin assets

    Tue, Jul 29, 2014

    Aker Solutions updates on proposed demerger

    Fri, Jul 11, 2014

    The board of directors of Aker Solutions ASA has, in accordance with the strategy disclosed April 30, resolved to propose to the company's shareholders that Aker Solutions be split into two companies. The board has also determined to write down the value of some assets in the Aker Oilfield Services unit of Akastor, one of two companies that will emerge from the separation.

    Parsley Energy joins Russell indexes

    Tue, Jul 1, 2014

    Parsley Energy Inc. has been added to the broad market Russell 3000, small-cap Russell 2000, and Russell Global indexes, along with appropriate style, sector, and country indexes, effective after the market close on June 27, in association with Russell Investments’ annual reconstitution of its comprehensive set of US and global equity indexes.

    Most Popular

    Oil & Gas Jobs

    Search More Job Listings >>
    Subscribe to OGFJ